How Can You Tell Who Hit Who in a Car crash?

June 27, 2025 | By Suits & Boots Accident Injury Lawyer
How Can You Tell Who Hit Who in a Car crash?

The answer isn't always simple, but figuring out who hit who in a car accident can almost always be found by piecing together evidence left behind. From the police report to the location of vehicle damage, this key evidence can build a clear picture of what happened.

If you’ve suffered injuries in a car accident, you might be worried about paying for medical bills, fixing your car, and protecting your future. Understanding how fault is determined in a car accident is the first step toward holding the correct person accountable.

The Official Record: What the Police Report Reveals

After a car wreck in Houston, one of the most important documents created is the Texas Peace Officer’s Crash Report (Form CR-3). While you were likely focused on getting medical attention and processing the shock of the event, an officer was gathering initial facts at the scene. This report is often the starting point for any insurance claim or legal action.

Police officer assisting a woman with filling out a car accident report form next to a damaged vehicle.

The police report contains a wealth of information that helps tell the story of the crash. It includes a diagram of the accident scene, the officer’s narrative of what they believe happened, and any citations they issued. 

For example, if one driver was ticketed for running a red light or an unsafe lane change, that information clearly indicates fault. However, it is important to remember that the officer's opinion is not the final word. It is a valuable piece of evidence, but it can be challenged if other facts contradict it. You can typically request a copy of your crash report from the Texas Department of Transportation, and having this document is a critical first step.

Reading the Wreckage: What Vehicle Damage Tells Us

The cars themselves often tell the truest story. Where a vehicle is damaged, and the type of damage it sustained, can provide undeniable physical proof of the sequence of events. Experienced investigators can look at the aftermath and reconstruct the moments leading up to the impact.

Rear-End Collisions

In most cases involving a rear-end crash, the driver of the rear car is considered at fault. This is because every driver has a duty to maintain a safe following distance. However, there are exceptions. If the front driver slammed on their brakes for no reason, had broken brake lights, or suddenly reversed, they could share or hold all of the responsibility. The location of the damage, almost always on the front bumper of one car and the rear bumper of the other, is the primary clue.

T-Bone or Side-Impact Accidents

These crashes, often happening at intersections along busy roads like Richmond Avenue or Westheimer Road, are frequently caused by one driver failing to yield the right-of-way. A "T-bone" crash, where the front of one car hits the side of another, usually indicates that one driver:

  • Ran a red light or stop sign.
  • Made an unsafe left turn in front of oncoming traffic.
  • Pulled out into traffic from a private drive or parking lot without looking.

The location of the impact on the side of the vehicle is the key piece of evidence that points to which driver had the right-of-way and which one violated it.

Head-On and Sideswipe Collisions

Head-on crashes are among the most dangerous and often result from one driver leaving their designated lane and entering oncoming traffic. Evidence like tire skid marks crossing the yellow centerline can clearly show who was in the wrong lane. 

Similarly, sideswipe accidents happen when a driver drifts into an adjacent lane. Clues like paint transfer, broken side mirrors, and scrapes along the side of the cars help determine who failed to stay in their lane, which can be a common occurrence on Houston's wide freeways like I-10 or the 610 Loop.

Understanding what the physical evidence suggests is a powerful tool in establishing a clear and factual account of the accident, free from conflicting stories or opinions.

Beyond the Vehicles: Other Evidence That Builds Your Case

While the police report and vehicle damage are foundational, other types of evidence are crucial for creating a complete and undeniable narrative of the accident. When you are back home and able to think more clearly, considering what other information might exist can make a significant difference. A strong case is built on a wide range of supporting facts.

Here are some other critical sources of information:

  • Witness Statements: Independent witnesses who saw the crash can provide an unbiased account. Their testimony can confirm your version of events and dispute any incorrect statements from the other driver.
  • Photos and Videos: If you or anyone else took pictures or videos at the scene, they are invaluable. These images capture vehicle positions, damage, road conditions, traffic signs, and skid marks before anything is moved.
  • Area Camera Footage: Many intersections and businesses have security cameras. Nearby traffic cameras, doorbell cameras from homes, or surveillance systems from local businesses might have recorded the accident as it happened.

This collection of evidence helps build a comprehensive view of the incident, often filling in gaps and answering the question of how to tell who hit whom in a car accident with much greater certainty.

How Texas Law Defines Fault

In Texas, determining fault is a legal concept rooted in the idea of "negligence." In simple terms, negligence means that someone had a responsibility to act with reasonable care, they failed to do so, and their failure caused injury or damage. Every driver on the road has a duty to operate their vehicle safely. When they speed, text while driving, or run a stop sign, they are breaching that duty.

Texas uses a legal rule called proportionate responsibility, also known as modified comparative fault, to handle situations where there might be shared blame. Under this rule, found in the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 33.001, you can seek financial recovery as long as you are not found to be 51% or more at fault for the accident.

If you are found to be partially at fault, your recovery amount is simply reduced by your percentage of fault. For example, if you are awarded $100,000 for your injuries and damages but are found to be 20% responsible for the crash, you would be able to recover $80,000. This system allows for fairness, ensuring that you are not barred from getting help just because you may have made a minor contribution to the accident.

When Technology Becomes a Witness

In today's world, technology often provides some of the most objective and compelling evidence available. Modern vehicles and personal devices can silently record data that can definitively answer questions about driver actions in the moments before a collision. This digital evidence is often hard to dispute.

Technology

Consider these technological sources:

  • Dashboard Cameras: A dash cam facing forward can capture exactly what the driver saw, proving if another car cut you off, ran a red light, or created a hazard.
  • Event Data Recorders (EDRs): Often called a "black box," this device is built into most newer vehicles. It records data like vehicle speed, brake application, and steering angle in the seconds before and during a crash.
  • Cell Phone Records: In cases where distracted driving is suspected, cell phone records can show if the other driver was texting, talking, or using an app at the moment of impact.

This data can transform a "he said, she said" argument into a case with clear, factual proof, which is essential when trying to show who was truly at fault.

What Happens When Stories Don't Match?

It is incredibly frustrating when the other driver changes their story or tells their insurance company something completely different from what they said at the scene. Unfortunately, this happens all too often. The other driver may be afraid of their insurance rates going up or facing other consequences, so they try to shift the blame.

This is precisely why gathering objective evidence is so important. When you have a police report, photos of the damage, and witness accounts, it becomes much harder for the other driver's new story to hold any weight. Insurance adjusters are trained to look for inconsistencies, but their main goal is to protect their company's bottom line. 

They may try to use any confusion or conflicting reports as a reason to offer a low car accident settlement or deny your claim altogether. Having a well-documented case based on facts, not just words, is your strongest defense against these tactics.

FAQ for How Can You Tell Who Hit Who in a Car Accident

Here are answers to some common questions we hear about determining fault after a Houston car wreck.

What if there were no witnesses to my car accident?
Even without independent witnesses, you can still build a strong case. The physical evidence, including the location and severity of vehicle damage, skid marks on the road, and data from a vehicle's EDR, can often tell a clear story. An accident reconstruction professional can also analyze this evidence to form a scientific opinion on how the crash occurred.

Can I still have a claim if I got a ticket at the scene?
Yes, you may still have a valid claim even if you were issued a citation. A traffic ticket is just the officer's initial opinion and can be challenged in court. Furthermore, under Texas's proportionate responsibility rules, you can still recover damages as long as you are determined to be less than 51% at fault for the accident.

How long do I have to file a car accident claim in Texas?
In Texas, the statute of limitations for filing a personal injury lawsuit is generally two years from the date of the accident. This deadline is strict, so it is important to take action to protect your rights well before it expires. Waiting too long can result in losing your right to seek compensation forever.

Does my insurance company decide who is at fault?
Your insurance company and the other driver's insurance company will both conduct their own investigations and make their own determinations of fault. However, their decision is not legally binding. They are private companies looking out for their own financial interests. The final say on legal liability, if an agreement cannot be reached, rests with a judge or jury in a court of law.

What is an accident reconstructionist, and do I need one?
An accident reconstructionist is a professional with a background in physics, engineering, and law enforcement who scientifically analyzes crash evidence to determine what happened. They can be very helpful in complex cases, such as those with conflicting accounts or a lack of clear evidence. They can provide an authoritative report and testimony that explains how factors like speed and driver action led to the collision.

Let the Suits and Boots Get Your Story Straight

The time after a car accident is filled with uncertainty and worry. Trying to piece together what happened while also dealing with injuries and financial stress can feel stressful. You do not have to untangle the facts and fight with insurance companies on your own. The right legal team can take on the work of gathering evidence and building a case that clearly shows what happened and who is responsible.

Suits & Boots Accident injury Lawyers office

At Suits & Boots Accident Injury Lawyers, we are committed to providing the guidance and support you need. We use our Max Money Method and in-depth investigative process to uncover the truth and advocate for full recovery. Let the WORK of the BOOTS and the SKILL of the SUITS get your money. Claim or start your free 30-Day Investigation today by calling us at (713) 489-0922 or reaching out through our online form. Let us help you move forward with confidence and clarity.